tgsonar

Bullgram files

@Bullgram_files
отвечает metrics disagree
15subscribers
167median views
1166.7%engagement rate
1posts per month

In short

@Bullgram_files is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 1166.7% of subscribers — higher than 96% of channels in the category. Publishes 1 post a month — less often than 96% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 19 Oct 2026, 2 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 2 days: +3 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

19.1028.10
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (1167%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30154 objects in the category.

subscribers15median 950above 6%
views167median 340above 34%
engagement1166.7%median 42.1%above 96%
posts a month1median 28below almost all

Questions

Is @Bullgram_files an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 28 Oct 2026 and published 1 post in the past 30 days.

Does @Bullgram_files have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 1166.7% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @Bullgram_files?

The median post gets 167 views — 1166.7% of 15 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers