tgsonar

LIN

@Cheryl19870
отвечает metrics disagree

Hi there! Here is almost all of my art ;) Anon: t.me/anonaskbot?start=g84z7

9subscribers
17median views
177.8%engagement rate
7posts per month

In short

@Cheryl19870 is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 177.8% of subscribers — higher than 83% of channels in the category. Publishes 7 posts a month — less often than 79% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 19 Oct 2026, 2 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 2 days: 0 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

19.1028.10

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 28минимум 7
What the measurements showed. вовлечённость 177.8% — вне коридора 1.5–150%, принятого в методике. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30154 objects in the category.

subscribers9median 950above 4%
views17median 340above 6%
engagement177.8%median 42.1%above 83%
posts a month7median 28above 19%

Questions

Is @Cheryl19870 an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 28 Oct 2026 and published 7 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @Cheryl19870 have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 177.8% of subscribers, metric consistency 88/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @Cheryl19870?

The median post gets 17 views — 177.8% of 9 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers