tgsonar

GLaDLSS | photographer 📸

@GLaDLSS
отвечает

Genetic Lifeform and Digital Light Storage System [TODO] ЛС: @Im_Not_GLaDOS Закреп: https://t.me/gladlss/355

48score in the category
423subscribers
169median views
40.0%engagement rate
62posts per month
Из чего сложился балл
охват
34%
вовлечённость
49%
активность
73%

In short

@GLaDLSS is a mid-sized channel for the Other category: a post reaches 40.0% of subscribers — close to the category median (42.1%). Publishes 62 posts a month — more often than 66% of channels in the category. Tracked since 28 Oct 2026, 1 measurements.

Position in the Other category

A score of 48 — ahead of 46% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.

балл 48 — выше, чем у 46% рубрики0100

How it changed

History is still building up: 1 measurements so far. We take readings every night, and in a few days a change chart will appear here.

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 457минимум 152

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30154 objects in the category.

subscribers423median 950above 39%
views169median 340above 34%
engagement40.0%median 42.1%above 49%
posts a month62median 28above 66%

Questions

Is @GLaDLSS an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 28 Oct 2026 and published 62 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @GLaDLSS have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 40.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 90/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @GLaDLSS?

The median post gets 169 views — 40.0% of 423 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers