tgsonar
нет новых постов metrics disagree
3subscribers
13median views
650.0%engagement rate

In short

@Gelign is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 650.0% of subscribers — higher than 94% of channels in the category. Over 14 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 50.0%, while median views held steady. The channel hasn't published a single post in the past 30 days. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 20 Sep 2026, 15 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 15 days: +1 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

no response20.0930.10
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (650%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30154 objects in the category.

subscribers3median 950above 2%
views13median 340above 5%
engagement650.0%median 42.1%above 94%
posts a month0median 28below almost all

Questions

Is @Gelign an active channel?

The channel exists and opens, but hasn't posted in the past 30 days. Last checked on 30 Oct 2026.

Does @Gelign have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 650.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @Gelign?

The median post gets 13 views — 650.0% of 3 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers