tgsonar

ρꪖꪗꪑꫀꪀ𝓽

@Hollypayx
отвечает metrics disagree
3subscribers
14median views
466.7%engagement rate
10posts per month

In short

@Hollypayx is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 466.7% of subscribers — higher than 92% of channels in the category. Over 15 days of tracking, the subscriber count barely changed, while median views held steady. Publishes 10 posts a month — less often than 72% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 20 Sep 2026, 15 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 15 days: 0 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

20.0930.10

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 19минимум 12
What the measurements showed. вовлечённость 466.7% — вне коридора 1.5–150%, принятого в методике. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 31534 objects in the category.

subscribers3median 857above 2%
views14median 325above 5%
engagement466.7%median 43.3%above 92%
posts a month10median 28above 26%

Questions

Is @Hollypayx an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 30 Oct 2026 and published 10 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @Hollypayx have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 466.7% of subscribers, metric consistency 88/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @Hollypayx?

The median post gets 14 views — 466.7% of 3 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers