tgsonar

⋮ ㅤ𝑐𝑓 ִ 𝑑𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑦 ͜𝑁𝑎𝑔𝑖 。♡‌

@Nagiliterally
нет новых постов metrics disagree

ㅤㅤ⋮  ㅤ𝑐𝑓 ִ 𝑑𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑦 ͜𝑁𝑎𝑔𝑖 。♡‌ 𝟏𝟎:𝟎𝟎 𝟏𝟐:𝟎𝟎 𝟏𝟒:𝟎𝟎 𝟏𝟔:𝟎𝟎 𝟏𝟖:𝟎𝟎 𝟐𝟎:𝟎𝟎 .

8subscribers
652median views
8150.0%engagement rate
1posts per month

In short

@Nagiliterally is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 8150.0% of subscribers — higher than 99% of channels in the category. Publishes 1 post a month — less often than 96% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 6 Nov 2026, 1 measurements.

How it changed

History is still building up: 1 measurements so far. We take readings every night, and in a few days a change chart will appear here.

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 1Kминимум 631
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (8150%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 31534 objects in the category.

subscribers8median 857above 4%
views652median 325above 65%
engagement8150.0%median 43.3%above 99%
posts a month1median 28below almost all

Questions

Is @Nagiliterally an active channel?

The channel exists and opens, but hasn't posted in the past 30 days. Last checked on 6 Nov 2026.

Does @Nagiliterally have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 8150.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 60/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @Nagiliterally?

The median post gets 652 views — 8150.0% of 8 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers