tgsonar

. ⁠ׅ ꒰֔ Набор в админы῞👨‍💻 \\ 🫂 .ᐟ ְ꒱ ⁠ׅ ⁠.

@Nitakusikadmins
нет новых постов metrics disagree
59subscribers
979median views
1659.3%engagement rate
13posts per month

In short

@Nitakusikadmins is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 1659.3% of subscribers — higher than 97% of channels in the category. Publishes 13 posts a month — less often than 66% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 29 Oct 2026, 1 measurements.

How it changed

History is still building up: 1 measurements so far. We take readings every night, and in a few days a change chart will appear here.

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 1Kминимум 657
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (1659%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 31534 objects in the category.

subscribers59median 857above 15%
views979median 325above 72%
engagement1659.3%median 43.3%above 97%
posts a month13median 28above 32%

Questions

Is @Nitakusikadmins an active channel?

The channel exists and opens, but hasn't posted in the past 30 days. Last checked on 29 Oct 2026.

Does @Nitakusikadmins have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 1659.3% of subscribers, metric consistency 60/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @Nitakusikadmins?

The median post gets 979 views — 1659.3% of 59 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers