Poong | A Master Chef in the $AVAX.
$POONG is a Master Chef in the $AVAX. Cooking the @Avalancheavax Culture with community noodle from the talent of Poong 🦆 https://t.me/PoongChannel https://twitter.com/PoongAvax
Из чего сложился балл
In short
@PoongAvax is a small channel for the Culture category: a post reaches 2736.0% of subscribers — higher than 100% of channels in the category. Over 17 days of tracking, subscribers fell by 2.8%, while median views held steady. Publishes 120 posts a month — more often than 90% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 20 Sep 2026, 18 measurements.
Position in the Culture category
A score of 64 — ahead of 78% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.
How it changed
Measured every night. Over 18 days: -7 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.
Against the Culture category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 1341 objects in the category.
Mentions
These links come from real posts: we saw @PoongAvax mentioned in these channels, or it mentioned them. Reach is the view count of the post with the mention when we measured it.
Who mentions @PoongAvax
- Poong Announcement @poongchannelreach 1.7K · 18 Sep 2026
Who @PoongAvax mentions
- Safeguard @SafeguardRobotreach 6.8K · 20 Sep 2026
Questions
Is @PoongAvax an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 1 Nov 2026 and published 120 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @PoongAvax have fake subscribers?
Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 2736.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @PoongAvax?
The median post gets 6.8K views — 2736.0% of 243 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers