tgsonar

Info

@adiejbs
отвечает metrics disagree

ℋɛℓℓσ ɛɤɛɼℽσɳɛ! Ƭℏⅈʂ ɕℏɑɳɳɛℓ ⅈʂ ⅈɳƒσɼɱɑᎿⅈσɳ ɑᎴσʋᎿ ɱɛ ɑɳⅆ ƒɑɕᎿʂ ɑᎴσʋᎿ ɱɛ!

6subscribers
207median views
3316.7%engagement rate
1posts per month

In short

@adiejbs is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 3316.7% of subscribers — higher than 98% of channels in the category. Publishes 1 post a month — less often than 96% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 23 Oct 2026, 2 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 2 days: 0 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

23.1001.11

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 375минимум 42
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (3317%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 31534 objects in the category.

subscribers6median 857above 3%
views207median 325above 40%
engagement3316.7%median 43.3%above 98%
posts a month1median 28below almost all

Questions

Is @adiejbs an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 1 Nov 2026 and published 1 post in the past 30 days.

Does @adiejbs have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 3316.7% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @adiejbs?

The median post gets 207 views — 3316.7% of 6 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers