tgsonar

[🪽] 𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚎𝙻𝙻𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 [🪽]

@angeLLight_port
отвечает

[🪽] ᥕᥱᥣᥴ𐔖ⲙᥱ! [🪽] ᥴⲧᥲρыύ ᥒ𐔖ρⲧ: @moonlight4583 ⳝ𐔖ⲧ: @angelLlight_bot ᥒ𐔖 ⲃ𐔖ᥒρ𐔖ᥴᥲⲙ ᥒυᥴᥲⲧь: @Moon_Angel_11 ⲧⲧ: @angellight_3 ᥴ𐔖ⲧρ𐔤ⲇⲏυɥᥲᥱⲙ ᥴ: @liliDeStorm | @Alternative_banners ⲫᥲⲏᥲⲧ? ⲧ𐔖𐔏ⲇᥲ ᥴⲧᥲⲃь: #angel_DKM ! нᥲчᥲ᧘᧐: 12.10.2026

92subscribers
88median views
95.7%engagement rate
82posts per month

In short

@angeLLight_port is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 95.7% of subscribers — higher than 71% of channels in the category. Publishes 82 posts a month — more often than 71% of channels in the category. Tracked since 5 Nov 2026, 1 measurements.

How it changed

History is still building up: 1 measurements so far. We take readings every night, and in a few days a change chart will appear here.

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 170минимум 23

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 31080 objects in the category.

subscribers92median 880above 20%
views88median 330above 22%
engagement95.7%median 43.0%above 71%
posts a month82median 28above 71%

Questions

Is @angeLLight_port an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 5 Nov 2026 and published 82 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @angeLLight_port have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 95.7% of subscribers, metric consistency 90/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @angeLLight_port?

The median post gets 88 views — 95.7% of 92 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers

Similar