tgsonar

Reviews/ INFO

@apex8989797
отвечает metrics disagree
7subscribers
193median views
3120.0%engagement rate
1200posts per month

In short

@apex8989797 is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 3120.0% of subscribers — higher than 98% of channels in the category. Over 5 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 40.0%, while median views rose by 24%. Publishes 1200 posts a month — more often than 98% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 1 Oct 2026, 6 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 6 days: +2 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

no response01.1003.11

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 283минимум 74
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (3120%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30154 objects in the category.

subscribers7median 950above 4%
views193median 340above 37%
engagement3120.0%median 42.1%above 98%
posts a month1.2Kmedian 28above 98%

Questions

Is @apex8989797 an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 3 Nov 2026 and published 1200 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @apex8989797 have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 3120.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @apex8989797?

The median post gets 193 views — 3120.0% of 7 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers