Thunder coven
рисуем 𐔌՞꜆. ̫.꜀՞𐦯
Из чего сложился балл
In short
@astrophagic is a mid-sized channel for the Other category: a post reaches 101.4% of subscribers — higher than 66% of channels in the category. Publishes 8 posts a month — less often than 74% of channels in the category. Tracked since 14 Oct 2026, 1 measurements.
Position in the Other category
A score of 59 — ahead of 77% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.
How it changed
History is still building up: 1 measurements so far. We take readings every night, and in a few days a change chart will appear here.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the Other category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 9642 objects in the category.
Mentions
These links come from real posts: we saw @astrophagic mentioned in these channels, or it mentioned them. Reach is the view count of the post with the mention when we measured it.
Who mentions @astrophagic
- Gveanel ART @gveanel_artreach 1.3K · 14 Oct 2026
Who @astrophagic mentions
- Gveanel ART @gveanel_artreach 421 · 14 Oct 2026
Questions
Is @astrophagic an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 14 Oct 2026 and published 8 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @astrophagic have fake subscribers?
Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 101.4% of subscribers, metric consistency 90/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @astrophagic?
The median post gets 1.1K views — 101.4% of 1.1K subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers