tgsonar

Black sky 🌌

@black_sci
отвечает metrics disagree

VPN для telegram, instagram, whatsapp, youtube @vpn4ru_redscaler_bot

37subscribers
468median views
1691.7%engagement rate
360posts per month

In short

@black_sci is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 1691.7% of subscribers — higher than 97% of channels in the category. Over 14 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 54.2%, while median views rose by 15%. Publishes 360 posts a month — more often than 91% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 17 Sep 2026, 16 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 16 days: +13 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

no responseno response17.0930.10
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (1692%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30631 objects in the category.

subscribers37median 910above 10%
views468median 335above 57%
engagement1691.7%median 42.6%above 97%
posts a month360median 28above 91%

Questions

Is @black_sci an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 30 Oct 2026 and published 360 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @black_sci have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 1691.7% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @black_sci?

The median post gets 468 views — 1691.7% of 37 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers