tgsonar

егеаааа

@casualarkhangelsk
отвечает
44score in the category
103subscribers
151median views
135.8%engagement rate
1posts per month
Из чего сложился балл
охват
48%
вовлечённость
73%
активность
0%

In short

@casualarkhangelsk is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 135.8% of subscribers — higher than 73% of channels in the category. Over 9 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 8.4%, while median views rose by 17%. Publishes 1 post a month — less often than 94% of channels in the category. Tracked since 25 Sep 2026, 9 measurements.

Position in the Other category

A score of 44 — ahead of 44% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.

балл 44 — выше, чем у 44% рубрики099

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 9 days: +8 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

25.0907.10

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 145минимум 2

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 8817 objects in the category.

subscribers103median 871above 22%
views151median 327above 34%
engagement135.8%median 50.4%above 73%
posts a month1median 28below almost all

Questions

Is @casualarkhangelsk an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 7 Oct 2026 and published 1 post in the past 30 days.

Does @casualarkhangelsk have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 135.8% of subscribers, metric consistency 100/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @casualarkhangelsk?

The median post gets 151 views — 135.8% of 103 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers

Similar