Сisсо Сhаnnеl
Cisco News and Vulnerabilities This channel is not official Boost the channel!! https://t.me/Cisco?boost More: @PopPolls @QubesOS 💻 @CiscoChat @Net3A t.me/Cisco/22556
Из чего сложился балл
In short
@cisco is a mid-sized channel for the News category: a post reaches 0.4% of subscribers — lower than 99% of channels in the category. Over 22 days of tracking, the subscriber count barely changed, while median views rose by 671%. Publishes 76 posts a month — less often than 53% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 18 Sep 2026, 23 measurements.
Position in the News category
A score of 26 — ahead of 11% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.
How it changed
Measured every night. Over 23 days: +63 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the News category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 1849 objects in the category.
Questions
Is @cisco an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 4 Nov 2026 and published 76 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @cisco have fake subscribers?
The metrics don't add up. That isn't proof of fake subscribers, but it's a reason to look closer before buying an ad. Our measurements: an average post reaches 0.4% of subscribers, metric consistency 75/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @cisco?
The median post gets 540 views — 0.4% of 18.3K subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers