Cruel History
It is forbidden to show on TV, publish on the Internet and write in books! 🇺🇲 Open to cooperation and calaborations. @Davidj3
Из чего сложился балл
In short
@cruel_historyy is a large channel for the Other category: a post reaches 5.5% of subscribers — lower than 88% of channels in the category. Over 3 days of tracking, the subscriber count barely changed, while median views held steady. Publishes 149 posts a month — more often than 81% of channels in the category. Tracked since 26 Oct 2026, 4 measurements.
Position in the Other category
A score of 53 — ahead of 60% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.
How it changed
Measured every night. Over 4 days: -200 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the Other category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 31080 objects in the category.
Questions
Is @cruel_historyy an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 4 Nov 2026 and published 149 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @cruel_historyy have fake subscribers?
Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 5.5% of subscribers, metric consistency 100/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @cruel_historyy?
The median post gets 6.3K views — 5.5% of 103.1K subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers