tgsonar

๑ׅ 𝓒seya :: 𝖣𝖤𝖲.𝖣𝖨𝖲𝖯 𓏼 ּ

@cseyaDD
отвечает

๑ׅ 𝔗𝗇𝖿𝗈 :: @cseyaDispInfo ๑ׅ 𝔇𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗌 :: @morfuses ; @candyCHANN ⵌREstart: 𝐎𝟑.𝐎𝟐.𝟐𝐎𝟐𝟔

22score in the category
558subscribers
74median views
13.3%engagement rate
154posts per month
Из чего сложился балл
охват
20%
вовлечённость
24%
активность
23%

In short

@cseyaDD is a mid-sized channel for the Other category: a post reaches 13.3% of subscribers — lower than 76% of channels in the category. Publishes 154 posts a month — more often than 81% of channels in the category. Tracked since 31 Oct 2026, 1 measurements.

Position in the Other category

A score of 22 — ahead of 8% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.

балл 22 — выше, чем у 8% рубрики0100

How it changed

History is still building up: 1 measurements so far. We take readings every night, and in a few days a change chart will appear here.

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 102минимум 14

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 32568 objects in the category.

subscribers558median 806above 45%
views74median 314above 20%
engagement13.3%median 44.0%above 24%
posts a month154median 28above 81%

Questions

Is @cseyaDD an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 31 Oct 2026 and published 154 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @cseyaDD have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 13.3% of subscribers, metric consistency 90/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @cseyaDD?

The median post gets 74 views — 13.3% of 558 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers