tgsonar

Durmiss bio

@durmiss_bio
отвечает metrics disagree
23subscribers
827median views
3565.0%engagement rate
1posts per month

In short

@durmiss_bio is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 3565.0% of subscribers — higher than 98% of channels in the category. Over 15 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 15.0%, while median views rose by 16%. Publishes 1 post a month — less often than 96% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 20 Sep 2026, 15 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 15 days: +3 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

20.0930.10

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 1Kминимум 698
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (3565%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30631 objects in the category.

subscribers23median 910above 8%
views827median 335above 69%
engagement3565.0%median 42.6%above 98%
posts a month1median 28below almost all

Questions

Is @durmiss_bio an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 30 Oct 2026 and published 1 post in the past 30 days.

Does @durmiss_bio have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 3565.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @durmiss_bio?

The median post gets 827 views — 3565.0% of 23 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers