tgsonar

КСВNШНАЯ

@friciswiczirxxwii
отвечает

corpus tuum mutilatum tange et veram catharsin experire. связь — @diviii_xxwii 18+

24score in the category
672subscribers
120median views
17.9%engagement rate
240posts per month
Из чего сложился балл
охват
28%
вовлечённость
30%
активность
10%

In short

@friciswiczirxxwii is a mid-sized channel for the Other category: a post reaches 17.9% of subscribers — lower than 70% of channels in the category. Publishes 240 posts a month — more often than 87% of channels in the category. Tracked since 31 Oct 2026, 1 measurements.

Position in the Other category

A score of 24 — ahead of 9% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.

балл 24 — выше, чем у 9% рубрики0100

How it changed

History is still building up: 1 measurements so far. We take readings every night, and in a few days a change chart will appear here.

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 123минимум 94

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30154 objects in the category.

subscribers672median 950above 45%
views120median 340above 27%
engagement17.9%median 42.1%above 30%
posts a month240median 28above 87%

Questions

Is @friciswiczirxxwii an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 31 Oct 2026 and published 240 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @friciswiczirxxwii have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 17.9% of subscribers, metric consistency 90/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @friciswiczirxxwii?

The median post gets 120 views — 17.9% of 672 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers