tgsonar

FurWhisk

@furwhisk
отвечает

Hi I'm FurWhisk 🐈

35score in the category
1.3Ksubscribers
241median views
17.8%engagement rate
4posts per month
Из чего сложился балл
охват
48%
вовлечённость
30%
активность
14%

In short

@furwhisk is a mid-sized channel for the Other category: a post reaches 17.8% of subscribers — lower than 70% of channels in the category. Over 17 days of tracking, subscribers fell by 4.3%, while median views held steady. Publishes 4 posts a month — less often than 87% of channels in the category. Tracked since 18 Sep 2026, 17 measurements.

Position in the Other category

A score of 35 — ahead of 21% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.

балл 35 — выше, чем у 21% рубрики0100

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 17 days: -57 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

18.0931.10

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 1Kминимум 165

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30631 objects in the category.

subscribers1.3Kmedian 910above 56%
views241median 335above 43%
engagement17.8%median 42.6%above 30%
posts a month4median 28above 10%

Questions

Is @furwhisk an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 31 Oct 2026 and published 4 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @furwhisk have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 17.8% of subscribers, metric consistency 100/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @furwhisk?

The median post gets 241 views — 17.8% of 1.3K subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers