[ ᅠ𝗂𝗄𝖾𝗆.𝖻𝗂𝗈. ᅠ]
In short
@ikem_bio is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 21727.3% of subscribers — higher than 100% of channels in the category. Over 3 days of tracking, the subscriber count barely changed, while median views held steady. Publishes 600 posts a month — more often than 95% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 16 Oct 2026, 3 measurements.
How it changed
Measured every night. Over 3 days: 0 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the Other category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30631 objects in the category.
Questions
Is @ikem_bio an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 3 Nov 2026 and published 600 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @ikem_bio have fake subscribers?
Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 21727.3% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @ikem_bio?
The median post gets 2.5K views — 21727.3% of 11 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers