tgsonar

𝘈𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦. 𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘵~

@irlaventurine_sun
отвечает metrics disagree

@imyiths on x

25subscribers
97median views
388.0%engagement rate
8posts per month

In short

@irlaventurine_sun is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 388.0% of subscribers — higher than 91% of channels in the category. Publishes 8 posts a month — less often than 77% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 3 Nov 2026, 1 measurements.

How it changed

History is still building up: 1 measurements so far. We take readings every night, and in a few days a change chart will appear here.

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 154минимум 23
What the measurements showed. вовлечённость 388.0% — вне коридора 1.5–150%, принятого в методике. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30631 objects in the category.

subscribers25median 910above 8%
views97median 335above 24%
engagement388.0%median 42.6%above 91%
posts a month8median 28above 21%

Questions

Is @irlaventurine_sun an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 3 Nov 2026 and published 8 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @irlaventurine_sun have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 388.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 78/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @irlaventurine_sun?

The median post gets 97 views — 388.0% of 25 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers