Набор в адм𝐥𐇽፝𝆅፝֟𔘓⃙᪲ᩢ⵿𐇽𝐯𝆅ᩘࣩ𝐢𝐧⃪๊᪺͜᷍ᤢ𝐠 𝐥𐇽ۣۣޫ𔘓꯭⵿ᩘࣩࣩ𝆇⃔⃕𔘓꯭፝֟᷍𝐤
᎒ׅ֩ᰰ︶прошу брать символы с отметкой канала, спасибо !♡ владелец :: @irljanedoekisser
Из чего сложился балл
In short
@lovinglook is a mid-sized channel for the Other category: a post reaches 9.9% of subscribers — lower than 80% of channels in the category. Over 3 days of tracking, subscribers fell by 6.9%, while median views rose by 244%. Publishes 396 posts a month — more often than 92% of channels in the category. Tracked since 14 Oct 2026, 3 measurements.
Position in the Other category
A score of 20 — ahead of 7% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.
How it changed
Measured every night. Over 3 days: -25 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the Other category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30631 objects in the category.
Questions
Is @lovinglook an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 1 Nov 2026 and published 396 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @lovinglook have fake subscribers?
Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 9.9% of subscribers, metric consistency 100/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @lovinglook?
The median post gets 124 views — 9.9% of 337 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers
