tgsonar
отвечает metrics disagree
1subscribers
3median views
200.0%engagement rate
2posts per month

In short

@margenrot is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 200.0% of subscribers — higher than 84% of channels in the category. Over 3 days of tracking, the subscriber count barely changed, while median views rose by 50%. Publishes 2 posts a month — less often than 93% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 15 Oct 2026, 3 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 3 days: 0 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

15.1002.11
What the measurements showed. вовлечённость 200.0% — вне коридора 1.5–150%, принятого в методике. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30631 objects in the category.

subscribers1median 910below almost all
views3median 335above 2%
engagement200.0%median 42.6%above 84%
posts a month2median 28above 4%

Questions

Is @margenrot an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 2 Nov 2026 and published 2 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @margenrot have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 200.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 88/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @margenrot?

The median post gets 3 views — 200.0% of 1 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers