tgsonar

openexpanse

@openexpanse
отвечает metrics disagree
78subscribers
358median views
253.3%engagement rate
2posts per month

In short

@openexpanse is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 253.3% of subscribers — higher than 87% of channels in the category. Over 16 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 1.3%, while median views rose by 84%. Publishes 2 posts a month — less often than 93% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 19 Sep 2026, 16 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 16 days: +1 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

19.0930.10
What the measurements showed. вовлечённость 253.3% — вне коридора 1.5–150%, принятого в методике. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30154 objects in the category.

subscribers78median 950above 17%
views358median 340above 51%
engagement253.3%median 42.1%above 87%
posts a month2median 28above 4%

Questions

Is @openexpanse an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 30 Oct 2026 and published 2 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @openexpanse have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 253.3% of subscribers, metric consistency 88/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @openexpanse?

The median post gets 358 views — 253.3% of 78 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers