tgsonar

»» 𝙋𝙀𝙉𝙎𝙄𝙑𝙀 ִ ۫ .

@pensivewm
отвечает metrics disagree
18subscribers
52median views
307.7%engagement rate
7posts per month

In short

@pensivewm is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 307.7% of subscribers — higher than 89% of channels in the category. Over 3 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 38.5%, while median views rose by 30%. Publishes 7 posts a month — less often than 79% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 13 Oct 2026, 3 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 3 days: +5 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

13.1031.10

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 53минимум 10
What the measurements showed. вовлечённость 307.7% — вне коридора 1.5–150%, принятого в методике. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 31534 objects in the category.

subscribers18median 857above 7%
views52median 325above 15%
engagement307.7%median 43.3%above 89%
posts a month7median 28above 19%

Questions

Is @pensivewm an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 31 Oct 2026 and published 7 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @pensivewm have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 307.7% of subscribers, metric consistency 88/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @pensivewm?

The median post gets 52 views — 307.7% of 18 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers