tgsonar

Сделки

@q_ALL
отвечает metrics disagree
29subscribers
191median views
648.3%engagement rate
13posts per month

In short

@q_ALL is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 648.3% of subscribers — higher than 94% of channels in the category. Over 5 days of tracking, the subscriber count barely changed, while median views held steady. Publishes 13 posts a month — less often than 67% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 2 Oct 2026, 5 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 5 days: 0 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

02.1003.11

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 296минимум 106
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (648%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30631 objects in the category.

subscribers29median 910above 9%
views191median 335above 37%
engagement648.3%median 42.6%above 94%
posts a month13median 28above 32%

Questions

Is @q_ALL an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 3 Nov 2026 and published 13 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @q_ALL have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 648.3% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @q_ALL?

The median post gets 191 views — 648.3% of 29 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers