unravelling woodland
oh dear…
In short
@redflyingfrog is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 91.5% of subscribers — higher than 70% of channels in the category. Over 15 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 19.1%, while median views rose by 79%. Publishes 32 posts a month — more often than 53% of channels in the category. Tracked since 20 Sep 2026, 15 measurements.
How it changed
Measured every night. Over 15 days: +9 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the Other category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30631 objects in the category.
Questions
Is @redflyingfrog an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 30 Oct 2026 and published 32 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @redflyingfrog have fake subscribers?
Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 91.5% of subscribers, metric consistency 100/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @redflyingfrog?
The median post gets 77 views — 91.5% of 56 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers