rvalue的生草日常
(可能位于火星的)大 草 原(? @rvalue_official 的个人channel 你以为是草图channel, 其实是日常channel哒!( 本channel可能包含以下内容: 迷惑图片/骨折游戏/过气车万/沙雕日常/文化课题目/高三碎碎念(已完结)/纸片人小姐姐 别问 问就是生草 消息无法保证真实性 深究请读者自行查证
Из чего сложился балл
In short
@rvalue_daily is a large channel for the Other category: a post reaches 63.2% of subscribers — close to the category median (55.6%). Over 3 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 0.7%, while median views fell by 30%. Publishes 22 posts a month — less often than 55% of channels in the category. Tracked since 11 Oct 2026, 3 measurements.
Position in the Other category
A score of 81 — ahead of 99% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.
How it changed
Measured every night. Over 3 days: +56 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the Other category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 11443 objects in the category.
Mentions
These links come from real posts: we saw @rvalue_daily mentioned in these channels, or it mentioned them. Reach is the view count of the post with the mention when we measured it.
Who mentions @rvalue_daily
- 鸥 Billchan 鸥 🍟 大薯 | 去码头整点薯条 @billchenlareach 435 · 1 Oct 2026
Questions
Is @rvalue_daily an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 21 Oct 2026 and published 22 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @rvalue_daily have fake subscribers?
Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 63.2% of subscribers, metric consistency 100/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @rvalue_daily?
The median post gets 3.8K views — 63.2% of 8.6K subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers