tgsonar

@slut_ton

@slut_ton
нет новых постов metrics disagree
15subscribers
1.8Kmedian views
10750.0%engagement rate

In short

@slut_ton is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 10750.0% of subscribers — higher than 99% of channels in the category. Over 16 days of tracking, subscribers fell by 6.2%, while median views held steady. The channel hasn't published a single post in the past 30 days. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 19 Sep 2026, 16 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 16 days: -1 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

19.0930.10
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (10750%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 31080 objects in the category.

subscribers15median 880above 6%
views1.8Kmedian 330above 81%
engagement10750.0%median 43.0%above 99%
posts a month0median 28below almost all

Questions

Is @slut_ton an active channel?

The channel exists and opens, but hasn't posted in the past 30 days. Last checked on 30 Oct 2026.

Does @slut_ton have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 10750.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @slut_ton?

The median post gets 1.8K views — 10750.0% of 15 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers

Similar