tgsonar

terrorxsm

@terrorxsm
отвечает

ig: terrorxsm tt: terrxrism pins: https://pin.it/5W90QGL8A dm: @manageroffalldm

44score in the category
129subscribers
132median views
102.3%engagement rate
110posts per month
Из чего сложился балл
охват
30%
вовлечённость
72%
активность
39%

In short

@terrorxsm is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 102.3% of subscribers — higher than 72% of channels in the category. Publishes 110 posts a month — more often than 76% of channels in the category. Tracked since 1 Nov 2026, 1 measurements.

Position in the Other category

A score of 44 — ahead of 37% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.

балл 44 — выше, чем у 37% рубрики0100

How it changed

History is still building up: 1 measurements so far. We take readings every night, and in a few days a change chart will appear here.

Views on recent posts

Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.

максимум 264минимум 36

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30631 objects in the category.

subscribers129median 910above 23%
views132median 335above 30%
engagement102.3%median 42.6%above 72%
posts a month110median 28above 76%

Questions

Is @terrorxsm an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 1 Nov 2026 and published 110 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @terrorxsm have fake subscribers?

Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 102.3% of subscribers, metric consistency 90/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @terrorxsm?

The median post gets 132 views — 102.3% of 129 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers