WakacawProject[Dump]
Из чего сложился балл
In short
@wakacawdump is a mid-sized channel for the Other category: a post reaches 49.8% of subscribers — close to the category median (57.6%). Publishes 19 posts a month — less often than 58% of channels in the category. Tracked since 22 Oct 2026, 1 measurements.
Position in the Other category
A score of 59 — ahead of 76% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.
How it changed
History is still building up: 1 measurements so far. We take readings every night, and in a few days a change chart will appear here.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the Other category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 11936 objects in the category.
Mentions
These links come from real posts: we saw @wakacawdump mentioned in these channels, or it mentioned them. Reach is the view count of the post with the mention when we measured it.
Who mentions @wakacawdump
- AxionOS - Updates @AxionOS_androidreach 2.9K · 16 Oct 2026
Questions
Is @wakacawdump an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 22 Oct 2026 and published 19 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @wakacawdump have fake subscribers?
Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 49.8% of subscribers, metric consistency 90/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @wakacawdump?
The median post gets 280 views — 49.8% of 562 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers