tgsonar
отвечает metrics disagree
2subscribers
48median views
2350.0%engagement rate
47posts per month

In short

@watewww is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 2350.0% of subscribers — higher than 97% of channels in the category. Over 9 days of tracking, the subscriber count barely changed, while median views held steady. Publishes 47 posts a month — more often than 61% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 28 Sep 2026, 9 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 9 days: 0 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

28.0903.11
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (2350%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30631 objects in the category.

subscribers2median 910below almost all
views48median 335above 13%
engagement2350.0%median 42.6%above 97%
posts a month47median 28above 61%

Questions

Is @watewww an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 3 Nov 2026 and published 47 posts in the past 30 days.

Does @watewww have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 2350.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @watewww?

The median post gets 48 views — 2350.0% of 2 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers