tgsonar

@wealthmaxing

@wealthmaxing
отвечает metrics disagree
1subscribers
10median views
1000.0%engagement rate
1posts per month

In short

@wealthmaxing is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 1000.0% of subscribers — higher than 95% of channels in the category. Over 16 days of tracking, the subscriber count barely changed, while median views held steady. Publishes 1 post a month — less often than 96% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 20 Sep 2026, 16 measurements.

How it changed

Measured every night. Over 16 days: 0 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.

20.0908.11
What the measurements showed. просмотры и подписчики не сходятся (1000%) — вероятна ошибка измерения, перепроверяем. This describes a calculation, not the owner’s conduct — see the legal notice for detail.

Against the Other category

Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 36082 objects in the category.

subscribers1median 655below almost all
views10median 286above 5%
engagement1000.0%median 47.6%above 95%
posts a month1median 27below almost all

Questions

Is @wealthmaxing an active channel?

Yes. It responded at the last check on 8 Nov 2026 and published 1 post in the past 30 days.

Does @wealthmaxing have fake subscribers?

Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 1000.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 70/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself

How many people see a post in @wealthmaxing?

The median post gets 10 views — 1000.0% of 1 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers

Similar