@Engineering_Ebooks
@Engineering_Ebooks1
Из чего сложился балл
In short
@Engineering_Ebooks is a mid-sized channel for the Other category: a post reaches 8.7% of subscribers — lower than 80% of channels in the category. Over 5 days of tracking, subscribers fell by 1.1%, while median views rose by 124%. Publishes 4 posts a month — less often than 87% of channels in the category. Tracked since 8 Oct 2026, 5 measurements.
Position in the Other category
A score of 34 — ahead of 19% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.
How it changed
Measured every night. Over 5 days: -36 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the Other category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 29891 objects in the category.
Questions
Is @Engineering_Ebooks an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 26 Oct 2026 and published 4 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @Engineering_Ebooks have fake subscribers?
Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 8.7% of subscribers, metric consistency 100/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @Engineering_Ebooks?
The median post gets 664 views — 8.7% of 3.3K subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers