lunafawn
express, not impress ᡣ𐭩 анонимка: http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=lunafawn
In short
@lunafawn_exr is a small channel for the Other category: a post reaches 153.5% of subscribers — higher than 81% of channels in the category. Over 3 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 16.3%, while median views fell by 23%. Publishes 37 posts a month — more often than 56% of channels in the category. Some metrics don't agree with each other, so treat the figures with caution. Tracked since 8 Oct 2026, 3 measurements.
How it changed
Measured every night. Over 3 days: +7 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the Other category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 30154 objects in the category.
Questions
Is @lunafawn_exr an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 26 Oct 2026 and published 37 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @lunafawn_exr have fake subscribers?
Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 153.5% of subscribers, metric consistency 88/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @lunafawn_exr?
The median post gets 51 views — 153.5% of 50 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers