Cloaking.House NEWS
📰 Here we talk about arbitrage and cover all the useful information. 🦾Cloaking.House is the best traffic filtering and cloaking service.
Из чего сложился балл
In short
@cloaking_house_news is a small channel for the News category: a post reaches 52.8% of subscribers — higher than 76% of channels in the category. Over 9 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 1.4%, while median views fell by 12%. Publishes 5 posts a month — less often than 89% of channels in the category. Tracked since 20 Sep 2026, 9 measurements.
Position in the News category
A score of 44 — ahead of 43% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.
How it changed
Measured every night. Over 9 days: +12 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the News category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 2724 objects in the category.
Mentions
These links come from real posts: we saw @cloaking_house_news mentioned in these channels, or it mentioned them. Reach is the view count of the post with the mention when we measured it.
Who mentions @cloaking_house_news
- NUTRA.CLUB | Public @nutraclubreach 85 · 19 Sep 2026
Questions
Is @cloaking_house_news an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 30 Sep 2026 and published 5 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @cloaking_house_news have fake subscribers?
Open data shows no signs of inflated numbers. Our measurements: an average post reaches 52.8% of subscribers, metric consistency 100/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @cloaking_house_news?
The median post gets 387 views — 52.8% of 843 subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers