EdChess [ENG]
Welcome to the innovative chess ecosystem @edchess ⏺️Join our chats: [ENG] https://t.me/edchesssss [RU] https://t.me/edchesschat ⏺️Support: @edchesssupport
Из чего сложился балл
In short
@edchessss is a large channel for the Finance & Investing category: a post reaches 4.0% of subscribers — lower than 85% of channels in the category. Over 10 days of tracking, subscribers grew by 2.3%, while median views rose by 19%. Publishes 32 posts a month — more often than 51% of channels in the category. Tracked since 20 Sep 2026, 10 measurements.
Position in the Finance & Investing category
A score of 59 — ahead of 75% of the category. Every grey dot is another object from the same category.
How it changed
Measured every night. Over 10 days: +833 subscribers. A break in the line means the channel did not respond that day.
Views on recent posts
Older posts on the left, newer on the right. A flat line means a steady audience; a jagged one means the channel leans on the occasional viral post.
Against the Finance & Investing category
Compared only against its own category: normal values differ for a channel with ten thousand subscribers and one with two million. The median is computed over 1820 objects in the category.
Mentions
These links come from real posts: we saw @edchessss mentioned in these channels, or it mentioned them. Reach is the view count of the post with the mention when we measured it.
Who mentions @edchessss
- DeDust.io – TON DEX @dedust_enreach 4.0K · 18 Sep 2026
Questions
Is @edchessss an active channel?
Yes. It responded at the last check on 1 Oct 2026 and published 32 posts in the past 30 days.
Does @edchessss have fake subscribers?
Some values fall outside the usual range. Our measurements: an average post reaches 4.0% of subscribers, metric consistency 100/100. Inflated views can't be fully ruled out from the outside, so this is an observation, not a guarantee. How to check it yourself
How many people see a post in @edchessss?
The median post gets 1.7K views — 4.0% of 37.0K subscribers. Ad prices are better judged by this number than by the subscriber count. Why reach matters more than subscribers